Featured

Hello, welcome to this site –

a rag-bag of writings, notes, images, talks, letters … roughly divided into overlapping categories.

Recent interest in the history of political movements such as the Women’s Liberation Movement, the London Gay Liberation Front and others that I’ve been involved in has meant like many women of my generation I’ve been asked for information, recollections, etc. So I thought collecting together stuff I’ve written over the last few years might save time and duplication – I hope it’s useful, and will be glad if it makes a contribution to the archiving projects providing information on the traditions we are part of, for the up and coming generations of activists .

My political experiences aren’t unique; they’re part of collective activism, shared by many, but personal stories can make important contributions to common histories. They also record information about people who aren’t prominent and well-known, which is something that can get lost in cultures where focus is placed on an individualistic approach to history, obscuring the collective nature of mass movements for social justice and change and the people who contribute to grassroots activism.

Feedback, in the spirit of constructive dialogue, is welcome.

Copyright

Everything written by me is © – please contact me if you’d like to use anything; if you quote anything please credit the source. If you own the copyright of any images or text used here that haven’t been credited, or know a person who does, please let me know so that I can give them due credit and acknowledgement. Thank you.

Cosmic microwave background image courtesy of Dr Candadi Sukumar: ‘A snap shot of the universe as it was some 13.5 billion years ago, several hundred thousand (380000) years after the ‘big bang’, a time before the birth of stars and planets and the formation of galaxies … One can view this image as an echo from the infant universe carrying the seeds of the future universe, the seeds of future galaxies, stars and planets. It may also be looked upon as an afterglow from an epoch of the early universe when matter and light separated.’

letter to MP

From: Frankie 
Subject: poverty, food banks, refuges
Date: 26 July 2020 at 15:31:48 BST
To: Rosie Duffield MP

Dear Rosie Duffield MP,

I am pleased to read that you have tweeted that you are appalled, as are many people including myself, by the fact that ‘child poverty is at an all time high, food banks are overwhelmed and refuges are cash-strapped.’ 

I note also that you consider that donating to a cause I believe worth supporting to be ‘obscene,’ [A legal fundraiser set up to support Jeremy Corbyn] apparently assuming an entitlement as to how I should spend my own pension or savings.

By what authority do you arrogate that right? As an adult I assume I have a right to make my own financial decisions. I have not made a public remark on the issue of your own decisions as to how you spend your salary and other income, e.g. the claim you are reported as having made for £211,887.63 expenses in 2018/19, although as a constituent or taxpayer I might feel I have a right to question your wisdom regarding these matters.

Is it really necessary to point out to you that the fund set up in support of Jeremy Corbyn exists precisely because, as a politician of integrity and decency, he stands in opposition to the very child poverty, exponential growth in the need for food donations and defunding of public services like refuges which you purport to be concerned about? Is there not an irony at play here? And does not the fact that so many thousands of people are donating in solidarity with Jeremy as he faces the continuing onslaught of rightwing attack give pause for thought – that maybe, just maybe, these people care passionately about social justice and anti-racism – or do you dismiss them all with the usual contemptuous stereotyping dealt out to anyone with the temerity to question you?

The Tory government has caused these dreadful conditions of poverty, hunger and deprivation. And, as you campaigned tirelessly against the possibility of a Corbyn-led Labour government that might have ameliorated this dire situation, thereby enabling the Tory election win, I can only invite you to consider whether you should take some responsibility for the negative role you have played in this country’s politics.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely

Enemies of the Earth

‘Let’s call these places ours, the solid earth, the actual world, held and revered and looked after in common.’ – Richard PowersNew York TimesJune 16, 2017 

Like the heinous destruction of irreplaceable ancient woodland in the path of the hi-speed railway line being built for the sake of shaving 29 minutes off a journey to Birmingham, the threatened devastation of our coastal landscape at Graveney Marshes is a horrific act. The heartbreaking decision to grant it planning permission beggars belief. 

Hundreds of people and organisations wrote to the Planning Inspectorate dealing with the application, enumerating the awful consequences of this social and ecological vandalism, explaining factors such as its impact on biodiversity, heritage, coastal defence, socio-economic life and landscape, the impact of noise and traffic and the potential dangers of catastrophic accidents. Like the land- and water-defenders of First Nation peoples standing up against vested interests, corporate power and complicit governments, the local community here and their allies fought courageously against this outrageous plan. Graveney Rural Environmental Action Team provided detailed, comprehensive information about the destruction of community, wildlife and countryside it would entail. 

§

‘We are bound in a covenant of reciprocity, a pact of mutual responsibility to sustain those who sustain us …. In Potawatomi, we speak of the land as emingoyak: that which has been given to us. In English, we speak of the land as “natural resources”, or “ecosystem services”, as if the lives of other beings were our property.’ – Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants

How ironic that we who have long argued for an end to fossil fuel dependency have to protest against a solar energy project. But projects such as Cleve Hill Solar ‘Park’, industrialising huge swathes of countryside, are entirely the wrong way to go about developing sustainable energy, benefiting only private companies and shareholders.

I write my thoughts here almost as a kind of therapy, to express feelings of dismay and deter depression, to vent outrage, not only about this specific plan but the underlying assumptions and attitude that make possible such atrocious disasters.

How did one species of the planet’s life-forms come to be so utterly alienated from, and ignorant about, the interconnectedness of the ecosystem we are all part of – so indifferent to its fate, so oblivious to its beauty? 

It’s a rhetorical question of course: we know how. The economic system that prioritises economic ‘growth’ that destroys the ground, air and water we depend upon prizes profit over all else. Its beneficiaries are intent on hoarding the wealth of the world to concentrate it in the pockets of an elite minority. They’ll use any techniques they can to perpetuate this, including greenwashing to con us that they are doing something good.

The terminology used in societies based on this system denies reality. Words fail us; euphemisms camouflage the truth. We speak of ‘the environment’ or ‘nature’ as if it were something separate from ourselves, something outside of us. The word ‘development’ also misleads, implying progress, betterment, yet ‘developers’ are often in fact destroyers. 

Perhaps other languages have better ways of talking about our earth. Speech that actually reflects the reality that we humans are one part of a vast, interlocking, finely-calibrated ecosystem in which each species plays a role, has a niche, fulfils a purpose and supports the others. 

Now, however, this carefully-balanced synchronicity is slipping out of joint, with our and our fellow species facing extinction and the planet’s very survival endangered. 

Yet the ecological terrorism carries on: poisoning and polluting our land, air and water, exploiting and killing people and other animals, in the ruthless pursuit of profit. The elite of this racialised, patriarchal, capitalist system have arrogated for themselves an assumption of entitlement, placing themselves at the apex of a hierarchy based on the deluded belief that they have dominion over all, heedless of the fact that the system is destroying the very raw materials it relies on: capitalism eating itself. 

§

‘That is the Copernican shift we should be seeking: not us at the center of the universe but the universe as the frame in which all living things live.’ – Adam Nicolson, August 2018 

We can only wonder what sort of person looks at natural and wild spaces, beautiful landscapes, acres of earth with its networks of waterways, and instead of seeing life, understanding themselves to be a part of it, sees only emptiness (‘muddy fields,’ as a representative of the company planning to destroy Graveney Marshes was overheard to say.) Who, rather than seeing millions of living forms, herons, earthworms, larks, insects, eels and voles, or hearing the air full of birdsong – sees only a blank space awaiting exploitation, ripe for the extractivist mentality to maximise financial value? Who looks at the sun – which shines on all equally, the source of all our life – and instead of seeing that light and energy as part of the commons, which could pour into and energise society through the conduits of rooftop panels, plans to privatise and monetise it? 

Someone who simply calculates how much power they can harness and siphon off in speculative energy markets, presumably. Who hacks down trees and plants unaware that they provide our oxygen and recycle carbon, oblivious to the everyday miracles of photosynthesis. Who is indifferent to the voracious piecemeal killing of the earth which sustains all life. Who pretends that they don’t know the climate of the planet is out of control, in order to perpetuate business as usual. Who considers themselves so separate from the rest of nature, so broken is their relationship to it, they turn it into commodities, assets, private property. And then pretends to care about renewable energy generation when clearly corporate interests are the real concern.

Perhaps it is a person who has not stood on our coast in the stillness of night silence and gazed up at the stars wheeling overhead, or followed an owl drifting ghostly in moonlight across the marshes, or sat enjoying sunshine to admire the slow growth of orange lichen splashes on sea walls, or watched flocks of geese arriving by the thousand after long migrations, or sat on grass amid butterflies and dragonflies, listening to breezes in the reeds, and has never felt a profound sense of awe and awareness of the oneness of all living things. 

A person produced by a society that wrenches people apart into atomised competitive units, a society which has given corporates so much power they can act with impunity and indifference. A society with no feeling for the harmonious web of relationships between all living things in their infinite diversity, and evincing no sense of a responsibility to care for land or for other people of current or future generations. Which doesn’t realise, or care, that the soil that it carelessly bulldozes out of its way is alive, or that a handful of such soil can be home to more living organisms than there are people on earth. Who is ignorant of carbon and nitrogen cycles.

These are people who need to go back to school, to be educated in basic facts of biology and ecology. Yet they continue to destroy their own home planet, and planning officials, politicians and landowners collude with them. The schoolchildren protesting to save us all from destruction could provide much-needed lessons to such people. 

New research shows the devastating damage to every organ in the body from toxic air, the fatal extent of which the WHO deems a global public health emergency. The pollution caused by thousands of HGV and LGV journeys traversing local roads in Graveney during years of construction of this industrialised site and subsequently in itself constitutes an argument against this ludicrous idea.

§

There is a saying attributed to a Native American leader: ‘Only when the last tree is cut down, the last fish eaten, and the last stream poisoned, will you realize that you cannot eat money.’ Perhaps the insatiable profiteers realise that truth of that, hence the schemes to colonise moons, asteroids and other planets to extract yet more resources and become even richer, indifferent to the devastation, poverty and crisis left in their wake. So great is the extent of this hubris that some scientists have begun warning of a need for legal protection to guard against this expansion into space!

An open-mindedness to ways of relating to the world that differ from the dominant western view is desperately needed. ‘Interconnection is a central core of First Nations, Inuit and Metis worldviews and ways of knowing. Some First Nations sum this up with the phrase “all my relations”. This approach reflects people who are aware that everything in the universe is connected. It also reinforces the knowledge that everyone and everything has a purpose, is worthy of respect and caring, and has a place in the grand scheme of life.

The western model of land ownership, dividing it into parcels of individually owned sections, spread through European colonisation across the globe, is so normalised as to be unremarked. Yet to those people who know that we belong to the earth, and not it to us, it is absurd. Ultimately the concept of owning sunlight is as absurd as owning the sea, soil or rivers. Does the earthworm know that its world, the earth it creates and refreshes (without which, again, no life can exist) is covered by a title deed on piece of paper? Water too is a natural resource ‘owned’ by and under control of privatised companies.  And now the energy of the sun itself is being captured, stored, bought and sold, a commodity to speculate on in a callous system of exploitation which, like that of oil, gas and coal, rides roughshod over communities, indifferent to their suffering. The only hope is a change of direction to reverse the destruction. All over the world, this hope is provided by everyone who protests against the killing of the Earth by cynical corporate ventures. 

We have precious little time to effect this necessary rethink of the human relationship to the land and all the other creatures with whom we share the planet. Government institutions such as the Planning Inspectorate have made the choice to further the destruction not help to halt it. They may know, somewhere, that it is wrong to cover hundreds of acres of countryside with metal and concrete. But what hope of enlightened thinking or action to repair our shared world from those currently in power, of recognition that it is time for a radical paradigm shift, a reimagining our relationship to our unique planet and its life? In Britain’s current arid political landscape, it’s hardly likely that those in power will widen their remit to match the scale and appropriateness of action that needs to be taken and join those on the right side of history, rather than choosing to contribute to its ending. Nevertheless, we persist, and must fight on.

In the expanding solidarity networks of movements for economic justice, social justice, racial justice, environmental justice, at local and global levels – in kinship with grassroots movements of all ages and cultures, the ideals of HS2 protesters living in the trees, anti-fracking and anti-mining campaigners, indigenous peoples for decolonisation like the First Nations of the Americas and Aotearoa and the dispossessed Palestinians, the Black Lives Matter movement – we can see ongoing, worldwide work building links towards ending patriarchal violence, state violence, racist violence, ecological violence, and there find great inspiration.  

Letter to Guardian, May 2020

From: Frankie Green
Subject: ‘Britain’s largest solar farm poised to begin development in Kent’, 24 May
Date: 24 May 2020 at 17:41:34 BST
To: guardian.letters@theguardian.com

Dear Guardian letters Editor,
Not only did you initially illustrate your article on the proposed devastation of coastal land with a photograph of an entirely different place, (‘Britain’s largest solar farm poised to begin development in Kent’, 24 May), you repeated the claim by a spokesperson for the developers that they have discussed safety considerations with the Kent Fire and Rescue Service. However, KFRS is elsewhere reported to have denied ever signing off on any agreement (ref: https://whitstableviews.wordpress.com/2020/05/22/guest-blog-stop-graveney-marsh-solar-farm/.) 
Nor do you mention that one of the companies involved, Wirsol, is being sued in the High Court “for gross negligence and reckless misconduct” over other solar installations built and sold by them. There is serious doubt whether they are capable of building them safely. The hazardous lithium battery storage facility is a massive disaster in the making, placing huge areas at risk (see https://www.favershameye.co.uk/post/cleve-hill-update-2-1.) This project would set a very dangerous precedent nationally.
The Guardian has a record of environmental journalism that has not been upheld by this article. The ecological and social vandalism inherent in this project is on a vast, industrial scale from which the region, its landscape, people and wildlife will never recover. It would destroy the habitat of over 300 species of wildlife, including protected species. Mitigation proposals are risibly inadequate and simply constitute cynical ‘greenwashing’, while local people and civil society organisations are being overridden by commercial interests. The only beneficiaries of this dangerous scheme will be private interests pursuing short-term private profit. Solar panels need placing in appropriate locations, rather than jeopardising important wildlife sites or human communities. It is ironic that we who support renewable energy generation must oppose such schemes, but the greater irony lies in corporate destruction of the environment while purporting to be on the side of saving it.
Sincerely, Frankie Green

For more on this, please see also https://frankiegreenvariouswritings.home.blog/activisms/

https://savegraveneymarshes.org

https://whitstableviews.wordpress.com/2020/05/22/guest-blog-stop-graveney-marsh-solar-farm/